
On Wednesday, Time released an article, entitled Suffering from Facebook Fatigue?, which delivered a harsh criticism of the social network’s application platform. Specifically, the piece took aim at the means in which these applications are shared, and the countless number of daily download requests that members receive from their network of friends.
The Time article stemmed from a particular group created by a junior at Michigan State University, called “Official Facebook Petition: To ban the inviting of friends on Applications“. The group’s description reads the following:
“We the members whom have joined this group hereby request:
1. No application ask or require us to invite our facebook friends to [do] anything for any reason.
2. The ability and privacy to block ALL application requests”
At the time this entry was written, the group has over 1,070,000 members. And as Time points out, the movement ironically encourages its members to invite their friends to join the cause.
So how’d one of the most popular web destinations get to this point?
Just a year ago, Facebook launched its application platform with six full applications (Photos, Notes, Groups, Events, Posted Items, and Marketplace) where users were able to spread information to their own network by way of the site’s extensive social graph.
Seeing the immediate success from this new undertaking, the Facebook team realized they could make similar information expand just as quickly through the network, by allowing users to share their selected applications with friends.
It was a great idea (at the time) and Facebook decided to implement it in a huge way - by opening up its platform and allowing outsiders to build full applications within the Facebook framework.
Today, there are over 21,000 applications available to users.
Looking at the growth the past year, it’s undeniable that the Facebook team has developed one of the fastest and most effective ways to distribute information through a social network. But at what cost?
The rate at which these applications have flooded the site, and users’ inability to control the amount of received requests, has driven many Facebookers to feel left out out in the cold. So much so that Time decided to dedicate a full article to the growing dissatisfaction.
And, while this disturbance will likely have little affect on the network’s future growth, Facebook needs its core base to keep the site running. Without their support, it runs the risk of becoming just another Friendster.
So now it’s up to Facebook to address the article and make some changes before the discontent spreads faster than a Zombie application. Get movin’, Zuckerberg.